Sunday, July 4, 2010

Fourteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time, cycle C

LUKE 10: 1-12, 17-20
HAVE YOU EVER READ STORIES ABOUT CONVERSION? HOW PEOPLE COME TO MAKE THE DECISION TO ENTER THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? THE MOST ARTICULATE PEOPLE, THE ONES WHO WRITE BOOKS, GIVE VERY LOGICAL AND VERY BIBLICAL ARGUMENTS. SCOTT HAHN, A PROFESSOR OF BIBLICAL THEOLOGY AT STEUBENVILLE UNIVERSITY, WROTE A WONDERFUL ACCOUNT OF HIS OWN CONVERSION. HE WAS AN ORDAINED PRESBYTERIAN MINISTER, WORKING AS A PASTOR AND AS AN INSTRUCTOR IN THE SEMINARY; OVER SEVERAL YEARS, HE GRADUALLY BECAME CONVINCED THAT OF ALL THE VARIOUS VARIETIES OF CHRISTIANITY, CATHOLICISM WAS THE ONE THAT WAS MOST BIBLICAL, AND ULTIMATELY, HE JOINED THE CHURCH, ALONG WITH HIS WIFE. THAT ACCOUNT IS IN A BOOK CALLED “ROME SWEET HOME”. AND THERE ARE MANY OTHER SUCH ACCOUNTS BY CONVERTED PROTESTANTS, JEWS AND ATHEISTS, WHO BECAME INTELLECTUALLY CONVINCED OF THE TRUTH OF THE CHURCH, AND THEN MADE THE TOTAL COMMITMENT OF CONVERSION. I ENJOY READING THESE ACCOUNTS. THEY ARE WONDERFUL SOURCES FOR APOLOGETICS, WHEN I FIND MYSELF IN A DISCUSSION IN WHICH I AM CALLED UPON TO DEFEND MY FAITH.
BUT I HAVE A FEELING THAT IF YOU SPEAK TO MOST CONVERTS, VERY FEW HAVE BEEN INFLUENCED BY BRILLIANT LOGIC OR ASTUTE BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION. MOST OF THE CONVERTS I'VE DEALT WITH PERSONALLY CAME INTO THE CHURCH AFTER BEING MARRIED TO A CATHOLIC FOR A WHILE, AND AS ONE OF THEM PUT IT, “WHY NOT?” I KNOW ONE OF MY AUNTS, WHO HAD BEEN RAISED IN A SMALL DENOMINATION IN CENTRAL MISSOURI, CONVERTED AFTER HAVING HAD A LARGE FAMILY WITH MY UNCLE, AND I AM SURE THAT A GOOD PART OF HER MOTIVATION WAS PROBABLY THAT SHE FELT INCREASINGLY LEFT OUT WHEN THEY WOULD ALL GO TO SUNDAY MASS AND RECEIVE COMMUNION. OH, WELL, WHATEVER IT TAKES.
BUT THERE IS A THIRD WAY PEOPLE FIND THEIR WAY INTO THE CHURCH. I AM SURE SOME OF YOU HAVE HEARD OF DOROTHY DAY. SHE DIED IN 1980, AND SOMEDAY SHE MAY BE A SAINT. SHE GREW UP WITHOUT A RELIGION, ALTHOUGH HER PARENTS WERE NOMINAL EPISCOPALIANS. IN COLLEGE SHE BECAME A MARXIST, AND WROTE FOR VARIOUS RADICAL PUBLICATIONS. SHE LED A PROMISCUOUS LIFE, HAD AT LEAST ONE ABORTION, AND THEN, WHILE SHE WAS PREGNANT WITH THE CHILD SHE WOULD ONE DAY BEAR, SHE DECIDED TO BRING UP THE CHILD AS A CATHOLIC. HER REASONS WEREN'T CLEAR; IN HER AUTOBIOGRAPHY SHE WANTED FOR HER DAUGHTER WHAT SHE THOUGHT HAD BEEN LACKING IN HER CHILDHOOD – A SENSE OF CERTAINTY AND PURPOSE. IN ORDER TO DO THIS, SHE HAD TO LEARN W,HAT THE CHURCH TAUGHT, AND EVENTUALLY SHE ENTERED THE CHURCH AS WELL, EVEN THOUGH, AS SHE ADMITS, SHE HAD A HARD TIME ACCEPTING SOME OF THE DOCTRINES OF THE CHURCH. ONCE A CATHOLIC, SHE CONTINUED HER WORK FOR THE POOR, HER ADVOCACY OF UNIONS, HER PACIFISM – BUT SHE WAS A ROCK-SOLID CATHOLIC, DEVOTED TO THE EUCHARIST AND THE BLESSED MOTHER, SO MUCH SO THAT PEOPLE HAD A HARD TIME SEEING HOW SHE COULD BE RADICAL IN TERMS OF POLITICS BUT SO CONVENTIONAL IN TERMS OF HER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.
SHE WROTE IN HER AUTOBIOGRAPHY: “NOT LONG AFTERWARD A PRIEST WANTED ME TO WRITE A STORY OF MY CONVERSION, TELLING HOW THE SOCIAL TEACHING OF THE CHURCH HAD LED ME TO EMBRACE CATHOLICISM. BUT I KNEW NOTHING OF THE SOCIAL TEACHING OF THE CHURCH AT THAT TIME. I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE ENCYCLICALS. I FELT THAT THE CHURCH WAS THE CHURCH OF THE POOR, THAT ST. PATRICK’S HAD BEEN BUILT FROM THE PENNIES OF SERVANT GIRLS, THAT IT CARED FOR THE EMIGRANT, IT ESTABLISHED HOSPITALS, ORPHANAGES, DAY NURSERIES, HOUSES OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD, HOMES FOR THE AGED ... “ DOROTHY DAY DID NOT CONVERT FOR INTELLECTUAL REASONS OR BECAUSE SHE HAD LIVED WITH A CATHOLIC. HER CONVERSION WAS ALMOST IN SPITE OF WHAT SHE KNEW OF CATHOLICS AND CATHOLICISM, BECAUSE EVEN WHEN SHE CONVERTED, SHE FELT THAT ALL THE WONDERFUL THINGS THE CHURCH DID WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY IF THE CHURCH USED ITS POWER TO CHANGE SOCIETY.
SO DOROTHY DAY WAS CONVERTED PRIMARILY AND ONLY BECAUSE IN ALL THE WORLD, THERE WAS ONE PLACE WHERE SHE COULD SEE THAT THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN WAS AT HAND – THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED IN TODAY'S GOSPEL. NOTICE THAT JESUS DID NOT EQUIP THE SEVENTY DISCIPLES WITH CLEVER ARGUMENTS OR WELL WRITTEN COMMENTARIES. IN FACT, HE INSISTED THAT THEY TRAVEL PRETTY LIGHTLY – NO WALKING STICK, NO MONEY, NO BAG IN WHICH TO CARRY A LITTLE LUNCH – NO SHOES EVEN. AND HIS CHARGE TO THEM WAS FIRST, TO HEAL THE SICK, THEN TO ANNOUNCE THAT THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS AT HAND. AND THE RESULTS WERE SPECTACULAR! EVEN JESUS WAS IMPRESSED.
IN PLACES WHERE THE CHURCH IS GROWING, IN AFRICA WHERE IT HAS TRIPLED IN MEMBERSHIP IN TWENTY YEARS; IN INDIA, WHERE THE CHURCH IS SENDING INDIAN PRIESTS AND NUNS TO OTHER COUNTRIES; EVEN IN CHINA, WHERE DESPITE INCREDIBLE ODDS, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS ALIVE AND HEALTHY AND GROWING – WHERE THE CHURCH IS HEALTHIEST, THAT IS WHERE PEOPLE SEE THAT THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS AT HAND.
IT'S HARDER TO SEE IT IN OUR COUNTRY. HERE IN NEW ENGLAND, WE'VE SEEN THE CHARITABLE WORKS OF THE CHURCH TAKE A REAL HIT; THIS YEAR OUR DIOCESE HAS LAID OFF ONE THIRD OF THE EMPLOYEES AND RETRENCHED IN TERMS OF ITS MINISTRIES. AMONG THOSE HARDEST HIT, OF COURSE, WILL BE THE POOR WHO HAVE DEPENDED ON THE SERVICES OF THE CHURCH. OVER THE PAST 20 YEARS WE'VE SEEN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS CLOSE. TODAY IF YOU ARE POOR AND NEEDY YOU WOULD PROBABLY TURN TO SOME GOVERNMENT AGENCY FIRST; THE CHURCH WOULD NOT BE YOUR FIRST THOUGHT.
OUR CHURCH CAN WIN A FEW SOULS WITH INTELLECTUAL ARGUMENTS, AND A FEW MORE THROUGH MARRIAGE, ALTHOUGH WE PROBABLY LOSE AS MANY AS WE GAIN THROUGH MIXED MARRIAGES. BUT IF THE CHURCH IS TRULY GOING TO WIN SOULS SOMEHOW WE HAVE TO GET BACK TO SHOWING THE WORLD THAT THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS AT HAND. SO THE QUESTION FOR TODAY IS, HOW ARE YOU AND I GOING TO SHOW THE PEOPLE OF LONGMEADOW THAT THE KINGDOM IS AT HAND?